Tuesday, May 19, 2009

Chaput on Notre Dame

I think Archbishop Chaput is one of the clearest thinkers in the American Episcopacy today. Example #1 (emphasis added):

Archbishop Chaput on Notre Dame and the issues that remain

"I have found that even among those who did not go to Notre Dame, even among those who do not share the Catholic faith, there is a special expectation, a special hope, for what Notre Dame can accomplish in the world."

~ Reverend John Jenkins, C.S.C., May 17, 2009

Most graduation speeches are a mix of piety and optimism designed to ease students smoothly into real life. The best have humor. Some genuinely inspire. But only a rare few manage to be pious, optimistic, evasive, sad and damaging all at the same time. Father John Jenkins, C.S.C., Notre Dame’s president, is a man of substantial intellect and ability. This makes his introductory comments to President Obama’s Notre Dame commencement speech on May 17 all the more embarrassing.

Let’s remember that the debate over President Obama’s appearance at Notre Dame was never about whether he is a good or bad man. The president is clearly a sincere and able man. By his own words, religion has had a major influence in his life. We owe him the respect Scripture calls us to show all public officials. We have a duty to pray for his wisdom and for the success of his service to the common good -- insofar as it is guided by right moral reasoning.

We also have the duty to oppose him when he’s wrong on foundational issues like abortion, embryonic stem cell research and similar matters. And we also have the duty to avoid prostituting our Catholic identity by appeals to phony dialogue that mask an abdication of our moral witness. Notre Dame did not merely invite the president to speak at its commencement. It also conferred an unnecessary and unearned honorary law degree on a man committed to upholding one of the worst Supreme Court decisions in our nation’s history: Roe v. Wade.

In doing so, Notre Dame ignored the U.S. bishops’ guidance in their 2004 statement, Catholics in Political Life. It ignored the concerns of Ambassador Mary Ann Glendon, Notre Dame’s 2009 Laetare Medal honoree – who, unlike the president, certainly did deserve her award, but finally declined it in frustration with the university’s action. It ignored appeals from the university’s local bishop, the president of the U.S. Catholic bishops’ conference, more than 70 other bishops, many thousands of Notre Dame alumni and hundreds of thousands of other American Catholics. Even here in Colorado, I’ve heard from too many to count.

There was no excuse – none, except intellectual vanity – for the university to persist in its course. And Father Jenkins compounded a bad original decision with evasive and disingenuous explanations to subsequently justify it.

These are hard words, but they’re deserved precisely because of Father Jenkins’ own remarks on May 17: Until now, American Catholics have indeed had “a special expectation, a special hope for what Notre Dame can accomplish in the world.” For many faithful Catholics – and not just a “small but vocal group” described with such inexcusable disdain and ignorance in journals like Time magazine -- that changed Sunday.

The May 17 events do have some fitting irony, though. Almost exactly 25 years ago, Notre Dame provided the forum for Gov. Mario Cuomo to outline the “Catholic” case for “pro-choice” public service. At the time, Cuomo’s speech was hailed in the media as a masterpiece of American Catholic legal and moral reasoning. In retrospect, it’s clearly adroit. It’s also, just as clearly, an illogical and intellectually shabby exercise in the manufacture of excuses. Father Jenkins’ explanations, and President Obama’s honorary degree, are a fitting national bookend to a quarter century of softening Catholic witness in Catholic higher education. Together, they’ve given the next generation of Catholic leadership all the excuses they need to baptize their personal conveniences and ignore what it really demands to be “Catholic” in the public square.

Chicago’s Cardinal Francis George has suggested that Notre Dame “didn’t understand” what it means to be Catholic before these events began. He's correct, and Notre Dame is hardly alone in its institutional confusion. That's the heart of the matter. Notre Dame’s leadership has done a real disservice to the Church, and now seeks to ride out the criticism by treating it as an expression of fringe anger. But the damage remains, and Notre Dame’s critics are right. The most vital thing faithful Catholics can do now is to insist – by their words, actions and financial support – that institutions claiming to be “Catholic” actually live the faith with courage and consistency. If that happens, Notre Dame’s failure may yet do some unintended good.

I have no further comment.


Coast said...

The emerging schism among Catholic universities fascinates me. In some of these cases, Catholic universities are calling each other out for not being Catholic enough (or perhaps, if we are honest, not being conservative enough).

I'm not too surprised to see the finger-pointing from an Ave Maria alum, as AMU has already been guilty of piggybacking off the Notre Dame - Obama commencement for their own financial gain.

A quick glance at Wikipedia's Ex Corde Ecclesiae US Catholic colleges gives us this list:

Aquinas College
Augustine Institute
Ave Maria University
Belmont Abbey College
Benedictine College
The Catholic Distance University
The Catholic University of America
Christendom College
College of Saint Thomas More
Franciscan University of Steubenville
Holy Apostles College and Seminary
Institute for the Psychological Sciences
John Paul the Great Catholic University
Magdalen College
Our Lady of Corpus Christi
St. Gregory's University
Southern Catholic College
Thomas Aquinas College
Thomas More College of Liberal Arts
University of Dallas
University of Sacramento
University of St. Thomas
Walsh University
Wyoming Catholic College

Where are the other Catholic colleges? Are they not conservative enough? Is their national recognition chalked off as simply pursuing prestige over truth? Or are these schools just a tad too liberal:

Notre Dame
Boston College
the Loyolas
Seton Hall
and the others

Is the frustration directed at these universities above because they are not Catholic enough in some eyes, or is the frustration due to the fact the latter list garners much more national attention, has more potential for impact, and has a longer history/legacy than the former list?

Marcel said...

I am more a University of Dallas alum, than I am Ave Maria. I never stepped foot on the campus and only moved there because my program moved in the midst of gaining my degree.

As for the schism, who is at fault? Is is those schools who have faught to maintain their Catholic identity or those who have allowed it to erode?

I don't use the liberal/conservative paradigm, because it makes the Church political. But, there are schools who have drifted off course from the teachings of the Catholic Church. They refuse to follow the guide of the Bishops and they have lost much of what makes a college or university "Catholic" in the midst of this drift.

Notre Dame wants to represent Catholic higher education in this country. If they take this on they also take on the responsibility of making sure that they are leading the culture, not following it. I don't question the catholicity of the colleges and universities that have the name Catholic, but I expect that I can comment on the state of affairs at these colleges and universities when I see issues with their identity. This is one of those cases.