Thursday, July 19, 2007

Reporting Rape is "Dangerous" to Planned Parenthood

Dawn Eden has written that PP Golden Gate will now fight the reporting of rape. They call it a "dangerous precedent". From their action report:
The California Attorney General's office recently issued an official title and summary for a new anti-choice ballot initiative. The title of the new initiative is "Mandatory Reporting of Pregnancies and Sexually Transmitted Infections in Minors as Abuse."

This dangerous new initiative seeks to amend the constitution and current law to require mandated reporters, like Planned Parenthood, to report any diagnosis of pregnancy or sexually transmitted infection in patients under 16 as abuse, regardless of the age of their sexual partner.

The estimated financial impact to the state is approximately $11 million for health and social services costs and costs to local law enforcement and the courts.
Of course, as Dawn pointed out, that this is the same group that made the following video. Watch and be amazed.

6 comments:

Gilbert said...

Wow, I'm thoroughly disgusted. wow. . . . wow

Undecided said...

Planned Parenthood has a history of hiding rape and trying to pervert kids. If you haven't already you ought to check out teenwire.com this is the site that they put that cartoon on.

Anonymous said...

i am sick to my stomach.....physically sick to my stomach. Is that real...I mean did pp really produce that.....show, if you can call it that.

Anonymous said...

that just goes to show how small minded people can be...we use the truth to win our battles...and this is all they got...a dumb video about them trying to fight the truth in the dumbest ways possible...i'm horrified

Chris Duffel said...

... it is so completely biased that its beyond, well beyond most things ... and then when I realize that the people who took the time to make this video really believe, with all their being, what the video states, it becomes saddening frustrating.

Cody said...

so much religious bigotry...how do they get away with it?

How can an intellectually honest person appreciate this?

The "super hero" says that it's the 1st Amendment that allows protesters at the clinics, complains about how they get violent at times, yet then she blasts them away...

Then the Senator (whom I thought was Ted Kennedy when I saw him) is brewing "do whatever I want stew" yet is not the whole "choice" philosophy designed to allow people to do whatever they want?

I don't know if I'm more insulted on a spiritual or intellectual level...